Table of Contents
Using IRA money to buy real estate is one of the most common questions we get from accredited investors who have spent two decades building up a brokerage IRA and want to deploy that capital into the asset class that built most of their net worth outside of work. The short version is that yes — a self-directed IRA can hold real estate directly, can subscribe as a limited partner in a multifamily syndication, can hold real-estate-backed notes, and can hold property indirectly through partnership interests. The longer version is that the rules under IRC §4975 are unforgiving, the operational friction of direct property ownership inside an IRA is genuinely higher than first-time SDIRA investors expect, and the cleanest version of the strategy for most LPs is to subscribe to a multifamily syndication as the IRA's limited-partner position rather than to take title to a property directly.
The rest of this article walks through the mechanics — IRS rules, UDFI on leveraged property, contribution limits and rollover mechanics, the difference between the “$10K first-time-homebuyer” exemption (a different topic from holding real estate inside an IRA) and actual IRA-held property — and lands at why the syndication LP route is the version we recommend to LPs evaluating retirement capital deployment into our deals. The two most common misconceptions we hear from first-time SDIRA investors are that depreciation will flow through to their personal return (it does not, because the IRA pays no tax and has no use for the deduction) and that they can hold the property in their own name (they cannot — the IRA is the legal owner, and any commingling can disqualify the account).
Key Takeaways
- A self-directed IRA can hold real estate directly — most traditional IRA custodians won't offer this, so you need a specialty SDIRA provider.
- IRS prohibited-transaction rules are the hard line: no personal use, no transactions with disqualified persons, and every dollar in and out flows through the IRA itself.
- UBTI (unrelated business taxable income) on leveraged real estate inside an IRA can trigger tax owed by the IRA — verify the structure with your CPA before you fund a deal.
Understanding IRAs and Real Estate Investment
An IRA is a tax-advantaged retirement account that the IRS treats as a separate legal owner from the individual who funded it. That separation is what makes real estate investing inside an IRA possible at all, and it is also what makes the rule set so unforgiving. The IRA itself owns the property; the individual directs investment decisions; and every dollar of income, expense, and sale proceed must move through the IRA's bank account rather than the individual's personal account. The structure does not punish ignorance softly — a single mistake on the rules can collapse the entire IRA into a taxable event in the year of the violation.
Types of IRAs: Traditional and Roth
Both traditional and Roth IRAs can be self-directed, and both can hold real estate, but the after-tax outcome of identical investment activity differs depending on which structure funded the position. Traditional IRA contributions are pre-tax (subject to income phase-outs if you or your spouse have a workplace plan), the balance grows tax-deferred, and distributions in retirement are taxed as ordinary income. Required minimum distributions begin at age 73 under current law (SECURE 2.0 raised the prior 72 threshold in 2023, and the same legislation steps it to 75 in 2033), which has specific implications for SDIRA-held real estate covered later in the article.
Roth IRA contributions are post-tax with no current-year deduction. The balance grows tax-free, qualified distributions in retirement are tax-exempt, and there are no required minimum distributions during the original owner's lifetime. The defining structural advantage is the absence of RMDs — a Roth can sit and compound untouched for decades. For real estate held inside a Roth, that means the full appreciation arc of a successful multifamily hold — cash flow, refinance distributions, sale proceeds — can compound back into the IRA without ever producing a single taxable event for the owner. Both account types share the same 2025 contribution limits: $7,000 per year, or $8,000 if the account owner is 50 or older.
Advantages of Using IRA Funds for Real Estate
Three advantages compound when the underlying real estate performs. The first is tax treatment. Every dollar of cash flow stays inside the IRA, every dollar of refinance distribution stays inside the IRA, and every dollar of sale proceeds stays inside the IRA — no current taxable event at the investor level. In a Roth, the eventual sale never produces a tax event at all, including the long-term capital gain and the depreciation recapture that would otherwise hit a taxable account holder hard. That recapture point is the structural feature that makes a Roth-funded multifamily LP position arguably the most tax-efficient single use of retirement capital in private real estate.
How depreciation specifically behaves on the IRA's books, both during the hold and at exit, is its own breakdown in our piece on IRA-held real estate and depreciation.
The second is diversification away from public-market correlation. A multifamily position inside an IRA produces a return profile that is structurally uncorrelated with the equity and bond allocations sitting elsewhere in the same investor's retirement account. The third is the discipline that comes from directing one's own decisions. Investors who underwrite a specific deal — rather than auto-allocating to a fund of funds — tend to spend more time reading offering documents, understanding sponsor track record, and matching the deal to their actual retirement horizon. That engagement correlates with better outcomes over time. The flip side — the disadvantages — is genuinely real too, and the rest of the article covers it.
The Role of Self-Directed IRAs
A self-directed IRA is structurally identical to any other IRA in tax treatment and contribution limits, but with a critical operational difference: the custodian holding the account permits it to invest in alternatives that brokerage-administered IRAs refuse to administer. Real estate, syndication LP interests, mortgage notes, private placements, precious metals, tax lien certificates, and private equity all fall inside what an SDIRA can legally hold. The IRS does not restrict the asset classes — the prohibition list is narrow and covers things like collectibles, life insurance, and S-corp stock. The practical gating factor is whether a given custodian will process the paperwork.
Most LPs discover the SDIRA structure when they want to deploy an existing brokerage IRA balance into private real estate, find out the brokerage refuses to process the subscription, and need to transfer the assets to a specialty custodian. That transfer is a trustee-to-trustee movement of funds — not a taxable distribution, not a 60-day rollover — and once the funds land in the SDIRA the account is in position to subscribe to a deal. If you do not already have a custodian relationship, we can point you to vetted SDIRA administrators we have seen subscribers use successfully, including in funding subscriptions to our own offerings.
Navigating IRS Rules and Compliance
The compliance burden inside an SDIRA sits entirely with the IRA owner. The custodian's role is administrative — holding the account, processing paperwork, filing required reporting, valuing positions annually — not advisory. A custodian will process a clearly prohibited transaction because evaluating intent is not their job; the IRS catches violations later on audit, often years after the fact, and the consequence falls on the IRA owner. Three rule areas warrant detailed coverage: prohibited transactions and self-dealing, UDFI on leveraged real estate, and required minimum distributions on traditional IRAs that hold direct property.
Prohibited Transactions and Self-Dealing
Prohibited-transaction rules under IRC §4975 are absolute. A single violation in a tax year disqualifies the entire IRA retroactively to the first day of that year, which means the full account balance becomes a deemed taxable distribution at ordinary income rates — plus the 10% early-withdrawal penalty if the owner is under age 59½. There is no minor violation, no proportional penalty, and no opportunity to unwind. The disqualified-persons list captures the IRA owner, their spouse, their lineal ascendants (parents, grandparents, great-grandparents), their lineal descendants (children, grandchildren, and the spouses of those descendants), and any fiduciary or service provider to the IRA. Siblings and cousins are notably absent — not advisable, just not categorically prohibited.
Self-dealing breaks the structure in ways most first-time SDIRA investors do not anticipate. The IRA owner cannot live in an IRA-owned property for a single weekend. The IRA owner cannot personally manage the property, collect rent personally, or pay themselves for any service rendered to the property. The IRA owner cannot do their own painting, plumbing, or landscaping — the rule against compensating disqualified persons captures sweat-equity contributions too. Property management must be handled by an independent third party, and every expense paid in connection with the property — taxes, insurance, repairs, utilities, contractor fees — must be paid from IRA funds, not from the owner's personal account. Commingling personal and IRA dollars in the same property creates ongoing compliance burden across the entire hold and is generally avoided by funding any given deal entirely from the IRA or entirely from a personal account, never both.
Understanding UBIT and UBTI
UBTI (unrelated business taxable income) and UBIT (unrelated business income tax) are the IRS framework for taxing income that an otherwise tax-exempt entity earns from activities outside its core purpose. For an IRA, the most common UBTI trigger in real estate is debt-financed income — the portion of rental income attributable to leveraged property. The technical name is UDFI (unrelated debt-financed income), and it is a subset of UBTI specific to debt-financed assets. The IRA pays tax on the leveraged portion of rental income at trust rates, which compress into the top 37% federal bracket much faster than personal brackets do (trust rates hit the top bracket at roughly $15,000 of taxable income).
The structural workaround that self-employed investors with the option use is a Solo 401(k) rather than an SDIRA. Solo 401(k)s are generally exempt from UDFI on debt-financed real estate under a specific IRC carve-out, which is why investors with self-employment income often prefer that vehicle for direct ownership of leveraged property. For LPs subscribing to a syndication, the UDFI question still applies on the IRA's pro-rata share of the partnership's debt-financed income, but the analysis is typically simpler because the sponsor handles the partnership-level math and reports the IRA's share on the K-1. When UDFI is triggered, the IRA files Form 990-T and pays tax directly from IRA funds. This is one of the genuine drags on the SDIRA-funded real estate thesis, and it is the right question to verify with a CPA before subscribing.
Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)
RMDs apply to traditional IRAs (including traditional SDIRAs) but not to Roth IRAs during the original owner's lifetime, and the threshold age under current law is 73 — raised from the prior 72 by SECURE 2.0 in 2023, with a further step to age 75 scheduled for 2033. The mechanical issue with directly held real estate inside a traditional IRA is that the asset is illiquid, and the IRA has to produce cash on the custodian's RMD calculation each year. A traditional IRA holding a single rental property with no other cash equivalent inside it cannot satisfy an RMD without either selling a portion of the property (rarely practical), distributing a fractional interest in-kind to the IRA owner (creates new compliance burden on the resulting partial ownership), or pulling cash from a separate IRA the owner happens to hold (works if available).
The practical implications are two. First, holding direct real estate inside a traditional SDIRA that you intend to keep past age 73 requires planning the cash position carefully so the property's annual income is sufficient to cover the RMD on the property's appraised value. Second, the absence of RMDs is the single biggest structural argument for using a Roth SDIRA rather than a traditional one when the underlying asset is illiquid real estate, especially for younger investors with multi-decade holding horizons. The 25% excise tax on RMD shortfalls under current law (reduced from 50% by SECURE 2.0) is a real consequence, not a paper threat.
Free 5-Day Video Course
Everything you need to evaluate passive multifamily — in five short videos.
Five 7 a.m. emails over five mornings. Earned-vs-passive income, syndication mechanics, K-1 tax treatment, market cycles, and underwriting — no credit card, no sales pitch.
Get Instant Access →Free. Unsubscribe with one click.
Financial Considerations and Strategies
Three financial decisions matter more than the rest when an investor is sizing an SDIRA-funded real estate position: how much capital to deploy and through what mechanism, whether to use leverage and what form of debt to take, and how to treat the tax math on after-tax outcomes. The three subsections below cover each, with the caveat that the cleanest path for most LPs is to deploy through a syndication LP interest rather than direct ownership — the operational simplification is meaningful, and the same tax advantages apply.
Assessing Down Payment and Mortgage Options
Direct property ownership inside an SDIRA can be all-cash or partially leveraged, and the mechanics differ from a personal-name acquisition in two important ways. First, the IRA — not the owner — signs every document, holds title, and bears liability. Second, any mortgage financing must be non-recourse, meaning the lender's only collateral is the property itself; the IRA owner cannot personally guarantee the loan because that guarantee would constitute a prohibited extension of credit between the IRA and the disqualified-person owner. Non-recourse SDIRA lenders are a narrow market with structurally tighter terms than agency or conventional debt — typical LTV caps land in the 50–60% range on residential rentals (versus 75–80% for personal-name agency), pricing typically runs 100–200 basis points wider, and the underwriting process emphasizes the property's standalone cash flow rather than the borrower's credit.
For LPs subscribing to a multifamily syndication, the leverage question is meaningfully different. The syndication entity (not the IRA) borrows the agency debt, and the IRA holds an LP interest in that entity. That structural separation is what allows the IRA to participate in 70–75% leveraged real estate without being party to the loan itself, and it is why our LPs subscribing through an SDIRA can access the same agency debt economics as personal-check LPs. The IRA contributes its capital alongside other LPs, the partnership signs the debt, and the IRA's LP interest receives its pro-rata share of cash flow and distributions. The capital-stack math works without putting the SDIRA in the awkward position of having to find direct non-recourse debt.
Utilizing Leverage in Real Estate Investments
Leverage is what makes multifamily real estate work mathematically — a stabilized property with 70–75% fixed-rate agency debt and even modest cash-on-cash yields produces equity returns that meaningfully outpace the underlying asset's appreciation. For an SDIRA buying property directly, the leverage profile is structurally weaker than the syndication-LP version of the same idea: tighter LTV, wider spreads, narrower lender market, and UDFI on the leveraged portion of distributions. None of those drags are disqualifying, but they do compress the return economics enough that direct SDIRA leveraged ownership tends to underperform direct SDIRA all-cash ownership on a risk-adjusted basis once UDFI is layered in.
The version that does pencil cleanly is the IRA as an LP in a multifamily syndication that has its own agency debt at the partnership level. The IRA contributes equity capital, the partnership borrows on standard agency terms, and the IRA's LP interest participates in the leveraged returns without bearing the structural inefficiencies of direct non-recourse SDIRA financing. UDFI still applies to the IRA's pro-rata share of the partnership's debt-financed income, but the math is typically more attractive than the equivalent direct-ownership case. For most retirement-capital LPs, this is the cleanest version of the leverage strategy, and it is the structure we use across our deal base.
Tax Implications and Benefits
The tax treatment inside an IRA is the entire reason this strategy exists. Rental income and capital gains grow tax-deferred in a traditional IRA and tax-free in a Roth. The headline benefit is straightforward, but the practical implications run deeper, and there are two specific items worth understanding before subscribing.
First, depreciation does not flow through to the IRA owner's personal return. That is a structural feature, not a bug: the IRA pays no current tax, so it has no use for the deduction. The flip side is that depreciation recapture at sale also does not reach the IRA owner. For investors with high-W-2 or high-business income who could materially benefit from real-estate depreciation against that income, funding the syndication from a taxable account often makes more sense than routing the same dollars through an IRA — the depreciation actually offsets something there. For investors without that taxable-income offset opportunity, or for investors using a Roth where the recapture savings at sale dominate the math, the IRA route wins.
Second, UBIT applies if you use leverage or run an active business from an IRA-owned property, and the IRA itself files Form 990-T and pays the tax from IRA funds. Mortgage interest is not personally deductible because the IRA owns the property, not you, and the same is true of property taxes paid in connection with the IRA's real estate — the IRA pays them from IRA funds, and the deduction is not relevant because the IRA pays no tax on offsetting income to begin with.
Real Estate Purchasing Process with an IRA
The mechanical steps for funding a real estate position through an SDIRA differ depending on whether the IRA is buying direct property or subscribing as an LP in a syndication. The direct-purchase path is more operationally involved at every step — from the title work that has to name the IRA rather than the individual, to the rent collection that has to route through the custodian's account, to the contractor invoices that have to be paid from IRA funds. The syndication-LP path collapses most of that complexity onto the sponsor and the property manager, which is why most accredited investors deploying retirement capital into real estate end up taking that route after weighing the two.
First-Time Homebuyer Considerations
The IRS allows an IRA owner to take up to $10,000 from a traditional or Roth IRA without paying the 10% early-withdrawal penalty if the funds are used to buy a first home for the account owner. It is worth being explicit about what this exemption is and is not: it is a one-time, lifetime carve-out from the early-withdrawal penalty for using IRA money to buy a personal residence. It is not a feature of SDIRA-held real estate, and it has no relationship to the rest of the article above. The $10,000 comes out of the IRA, lands in the personal account, and the personal account uses it to buy a personal home. The IRA is no longer party to the property after the withdrawal — it is just personal cash in the buyer's pocket.
By contrast, when an SDIRA holds real estate as an investment, the IRA itself takes title, the property generates income inside the IRA, and the IRA owner cannot personally occupy or use the property without disqualifying the entire account. The two strategies share the word “IRA” and almost nothing else. Investors looking for the first-time-homebuyer exemption are pulling money out of their IRA permanently (or until they repay the Roth contribution basis); investors using an SDIRA for real estate are keeping the money inside the IRA's tax-advantaged shell. If your goal is to buy a primary residence, the exemption is the right tool. If your goal is to deploy retirement capital into income-producing real estate, the SDIRA structure described in the rest of this article is the right tool. Mixing them tends to produce expensive mistakes.
Managing Property Ownership and Repairs
When an SDIRA owns property directly, every expense and every dollar of income has to move through the IRA's account. Property taxes, insurance premiums, repair invoices, utility bills, lawn care, pest control, contractor payments, capital expenditures, and management fees all get paid from IRA funds via the custodian's bill-pay process or via a dedicated checking account in the IRA's name. Rent collections come in the same way — tenants pay the IRA or its property manager, the funds land in the IRA's account, and the IRA owner cannot route them through a personal account along the way. The IRA owner can never write a personal check for any property expense and reimburse themselves later, because that reimbursement is the prohibited extension of credit that disqualifies the IRA.
The IRA owner also cannot personally manage the property, which means hiring an independent third-party property manager is not a recommendation — it is effectively required to stay on the compliant side of the rules. The IRA owner cannot personally collect rent, screen tenants, sign leases, paint a unit between tenants, fix a leaking sink, or supervise a contractor on site. Any of those activities constitutes uncompensated service rendered to the IRA, which is a self-dealing violation. This is one of the larger operational reasons that LPs subscribing to a multifamily syndication find the IRA path easier than direct ownership — the syndication structure handles all of this through the sponsor and property manager, and the IRA owner's only ongoing involvement is the LP-level reporting on the K-1.
Generating Rental Income
Rental income on IRA-owned property accrues inside the IRA, which is the entire point of the structure. The tax shelter compounds across multi-year holds because every dollar of cash flow stays inside the tax-advantaged envelope rather than getting taxed and netted down to an after-tax balance at the personal level. On a traditional SDIRA, the income is tax-deferred until eventual withdrawal in retirement. On a Roth SDIRA, the income is tax-free in perpetuity. Either way, the income recycles back into the IRA available for the next investment without leaking to current tax along the way.
The mechanical catch is that any UDFI generated by the leveraged portion of rental income is taxable to the IRA at trust rates, and the IRA files Form 990-T to report and pay it. UDFI is calculated as the rental income proportional to the average outstanding loan balance — so a property with 50% LTV and $20,000 of net rental income would have roughly $10,000 of UDFI before allocable expense deductions. The mechanics get more involved on partnership distributions (the K-1 reports the pro-rata share, the IRA picks up its allocable portion, and the custodian handles the filing), and the practical outcome is that LPs typically build the UDFI math into their underwriting alongside the headline cash-on-cash yield before subscribing.
How that K-1 income actually gets reported inside the IRA, and what UBTI flows through from the partnership return, is covered in our piece on K-1 income inside an IRA.
The Yield Brief · Free Weekly Newsletter
Multifamily markets, rates, and policy — for accredited investors. 2k+ subscribers.
Frequently Asked Questions About How To Use IRA To Buy Real Estate
What are the potential downsides of investing in real estate through an IRA?›
Three categories of downside warrant honest accounting before subscribing. The first is the depreciation pass-through: real estate's most attractive tax feature in a taxable account — the paper loss that shelters cash distributions — produces nothing for the IRA owner's personal return, because the IRA pays no current tax. For an LP with high taxable W-2 or business income who could materially use that depreciation against their personal return, funding the deal from a taxable account often makes more economic sense. The second is UDFI on leveraged property, which compresses the after-tax return on directly held SDIRA real estate that uses any non-recourse financing. The third is operational friction: SDIRA funding cycles are longer than personal-check subscriptions, custodians process paperwork on their own schedule, and any document needing the IRA's signature has to route through the custodian. None of these are reasons not to invest retirement capital this way; they are reasons to size the strategy correctly within a broader retirement plan.
Is it possible to buy residential property with an IRA after retiring, and how does it work?›
Yes, but with a structural distinction worth understanding. An IRA can own residential property as an investment held inside the IRA — the IRA takes title, rental income goes back into the IRA, and the IRA owner cannot personally occupy or use the property at any point. That works regardless of the owner's age or retirement status. What an IRA cannot do is buy a property that the IRA owner intends to live in, because personal occupancy is a prohibited transaction that disqualifies the IRA. If the goal is to buy a personal residence in retirement, the IRA route is the wrong tool — the correct mechanism is to distribute the funds from the IRA (taxable for traditional, generally tax-free for qualified Roth distributions) and use the post-distribution personal money to buy the home. The IRA itself stays out of the personal-residence transaction.
What are the IRS rules regarding using a self-directed IRA to invest in real estate?›
The operative rule set is IRC §4975, which defines prohibited transactions and the disqualified-persons list. A single violation in a tax year disqualifies the entire IRA retroactively to the first day of that year and triggers a deemed taxable distribution of the full account balance at ordinary income rates, plus the 10% early-withdrawal penalty if the IRA owner is under 59½. The disqualified-persons list captures the owner, spouse, lineal ascendants and descendants (and the spouses of those descendants), and any fiduciary or service provider. The prohibited transactions cover personal use of the property, transactions with disqualified persons at any price, paying yourself or a disqualified person for services rendered to the property, and commingling IRA funds with personal funds. The IRA owns the property, the IRA pays every expense, and the IRA receives every dollar of income. The owner directs decisions but cannot benefit personally from any aspect of the property until a qualified distribution from the IRA in retirement.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of holding real estate in a self-directed IRA?›
The structural advantages are three: tax treatment (cash flow and sale proceeds stay inside the IRA, tax-deferred in a traditional, tax-free in a Roth), diversification away from public-market correlation, and the discipline that comes from directing one's own retirement decisions. The structural disadvantages are also three: depreciation does not flow through to the personal return, UDFI applies to the leveraged portion of any direct ownership financed with non-recourse debt, and operational friction is real and meaningful on the first deal in particular. The advantages compound when the underlying asset performs; the disadvantages bite specifically on leveraged direct ownership and on investors with substantial taxable income who could otherwise use real-estate depreciation against personal earnings. For most accredited investors deploying retirement capital, the cleanest version of the strategy is to subscribe as an LP in a multifamily syndication rather than to take title to a property directly — the syndication structure preserves the IRA's tax advantages while handing the operational complexity to the sponsor and property manager.
Under what circumstances can I withdraw from my IRA to buy property without incurring penalties?›
The most common penalty-free withdrawal mechanic is the IRS's first-time-homebuyer exemption, which allows up to $10,000 (lifetime, one-time) to be withdrawn from a traditional or Roth IRA without the 10% early-withdrawal penalty if the funds are used to buy a first home for the account owner. Roth IRA contributions (not earnings) can be withdrawn at any time without tax or penalty regardless of the purpose. After age 59½, the 10% penalty no longer applies to any distribution, and traditional IRA distributions are taxed as ordinary income while qualified Roth distributions are tax-free. None of these mechanisms apply to SDIRA-held real estate — they are about pulling cash out of the IRA permanently for personal use, which is a different topic from holding property inside the IRA's tax-advantaged shell.
Using IRA To Buy Property - Conclusion
Using IRA money to buy real estate works structurally well when the strategy fits the investor's broader retirement picture and operationally well when the path is chosen carefully. Direct property ownership inside an SDIRA carries real operational burden — every expense routes through the custodian, every income dollar lands in the IRA's account, and any direct involvement by the owner risks a self-dealing violation that collapses the entire IRA into a taxable event. The cleaner version of the same idea for most LPs is to subscribe to a multifamily syndication as the IRA's LP interest, which preserves the tax advantages of the structure while handing the operational complexity to the sponsor and the property manager.
The discipline required — understanding prohibited transactions, planning around UDFI on any leveraged exposure, working with a custodian who can move when the deal needs them to, and planning RMD liquidity if the IRA is traditional rather than Roth — is the discipline that protects the strategy's after-tax outcome over multi-decade holds. None of these mechanics are exotic; they are the working knowledge any accredited investor evaluating retirement-capital deployment into real estate should have before subscribing to their first deal. If you would like to walk through how an SDIRA-funded subscription would work in the context of one of our deals, that is a conversation we are happy to have.
Sources
- IRS — Retirement Topics – Prohibited Transactions
- IRS — About Publication 590-A, Contributions to Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)
- IRS — About Publication 590-B, Distributions from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs)
- Cornell Law — 26 U.S. Code § 408 – Individual Retirement Accounts
The Yield Brief
Start your Tuesday with the moves that matter.
Join 2k+ subscribers for a weekly read on multifamily markets, rates, policy, and the moves accredited investors are actually making.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marco Canonaco
Marco is the Co-Founder of Willowdale Equity, leading acquisitions and debt placement on the firm's Class B & C value-add multifamily portfolio across the Southeastern U.S. He brings deep underwriting and capital-markets experience to every deal the firm sponsors.
Willowdale Equity content follows strict guidelines for editorial accuracy and integrity. Learn more about our editorial guidelines.
